You read that right, TSA is now selling individuals their
unalienable right that protects them from unreasonable and unwarranted
searches. It will only cost $100 for the
new government entitlement that permits frequent flyers to avoid having to wait
in long lines, take off their shoes, expose their toiletries in a clear plastic
sack or even turn on their computer at the airport. This was explained in an article which appeared in the Wall Street Journal
last week; but gave the impression that folks thought this was a good thing.
“The Transportation Security Administration is
rolling out expedited screening at big airports called “Precheck.” It has
special lanes for background-checked travelers, who can keep their shoes, belt
and jacket on, leave laptops and liquids in carry-on bags and walk through a
metal detector rather than a full-body scan. The process, now at two airlines and
nine airports, is much like how screenings worked before the Sept. 11 attacks.
To qualify, frequent fliers must meet undisclosed
TSA criteria and get invited in by the airlines. There is also a backdoor in.
Approved travelers who are in the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's “Global
Entry” program can transfer into Precheck using their Global Entry number.”
Precheck, well isn’t that special… (doing my best Church Lady voice from the old
Saturday Night Live show). If you’ve passed the government’s rigid interview,
which as the article states are “undisclosed”, then you can pay the government
a hundred dollars to restore your unalienable God given right previously
covered under the Fourth Amendment.
“The right of the people to be secure in their
persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and
seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable
cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Do you see what is going on? We as a
people have lowered our expectations and accepted the fact that our government
no longer is restrained from violating our rights. The purpose for the Fourth Amendment was to
acknowledge that all men have the right to be secure in their person…to be free
from unreasonable searches; not just those who’ve passed some government
established rule. Rather than fight them to the ground and force them to follow
the Constitution and Bill of Rights we cower and suffer their abuses; even pay
them to speed the process of enslavement and think we are the better for it.
“…let us first consider the origin of those
freedoms we have come to know are human rights. There are only two possible
sources. Rights are either God-given as part of the Divine Plan, or they are
granted by government as part of the political plan. Reason, necessity,
tradition and religious convictions all lead me to accept the divine origin of
these rights. If we accept the premise that human rights are granted by
government, then we must be willing to accept the corollary that they can be
denied by government.” Ezra Taft Benson
from his talk, The Proper Role of Government.
Where are Thomas Jefferson, Ezra Taft Benson and Fredrick Bastiat when we
need them in our day? You can find them;
their voices springing forth from folks like Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh and
other prominent conservatives who unrelentingly point out the abuse of powers
by our government and bring them into focus through their daily on air messages
and through their writings.
Modern day “pamphleteers” have a stake in the awakening of
public opinion; but now a days they’re called “bloggers”. If you consider how many people are
influenced by the written word as found on the Internet through social media
such as Facebook or Twitter entries which contain significant political issues;
are they not modern day pamphleteers?
So, stick a feather in my cap and call it macaroni!
This article has been cross posted to
The Moral Liberal, a publication whose banner reads, “Defending The
Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & The American Constitution”.
4 comments:
The whole problem could be solved by going back to private security.
The 4th ammendment wouldn't apply between private security and entry into private property.
It would also make it easier to sue for abuses.
P.S.I'm pretty conservative and I really can't stand Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity.
Currahee;
Thanks for your input; you're correct in saying that this whole issue would go away if the government had no part in it.
Very sad indeed, paying them for the privilege of not being groped. Bit like setting up daily payments to the school bully to escape wedgies and what not.
"Bit like setting up daily payments to the school bully to escape wedgies and what not."
I hadn't thought of it quite that way; does fit though. Thank you.
Post a Comment