Historians would recognize the term
“Potemkin village” as it’s used to describe “any attempt to make others believe
we are better than we really are”. I first heard the unusual sounding combination
of words this past Saturday evening as used by Dieter F. Uchtdorf in his
General Conference talk, On Being Genuine, when he addressed the Priesthood Session.
He intended to emphasize the importance of
actually being who you claim to be publicly as he explained the origins of this
interesting terminology.
“In the late 18th century, Catherine the Great of Russia
announced she would tour the southern part of her empire, accompanied by
several foreign ambassadors. The governor of the area, Grigory Potemkin,
desperately wanted to impress these visitors. And so he went to remarkable
lengths to showcase the country’s accomplishments.
For part of the journey, Catherine floated down the Dnieper River, proudly pointing out to the
ambassadors the thriving hamlets along the shore, filled with industrious and
happy townspeople. There was only one problem: it was all for show. It is said
that Potemkin had assembled pasteboard facades of shops and homes. He had even
positioned busy-looking peasants to create the impression of a prosperous
economy.”
As
I listened my first thoughts turned immediately to Barrack Obama and his
administration; lie after lie covered by smoke and mirrors, deception and stone
walling to keep the public in the dark until such time as the truth didn’t
matter anymore.
The health and safety
of our nation has taken a back seat to how Obama and his administration appear
in public; but I fear it is much worse than Grigory Potemkin’s slight of hand
trick to make himself look good, Obama’s implementation of Marxist communism
seems to be the driving force behind all this fakery.
An
example of Obama’s questionable use of the presidency, and I’m being far too
kind in calling it questionable; some might prefer treasonous…would be his
entering into nuclear treaty talks with Iran.
Thomas
Sowell wrote an article for the National Review, Obama’s Iran ‘Agreement’ Is a Charade, in
which he outlines the incredulity of forming any alliance with Iran and
believing this band of terrorists might keep their word. (I suppose the folks in Iran are saying
the same thing about Obama and his administration; none are men of
integrity.)
“By abandoning virtually all its
demands for serious restrictions on Iran’s
nuclear-bomb program, the Obama administration has apparently achieved the
semblance of a preliminary introduction to the beginning of a tentative
framework for a possible hope of an eventual agreement with Iran.
{…}
{…}
Why then all these negotiations?
Because these charades protect Barack Obama politically, no matter how much
danger they create for America
and the world. The latest public-opinion polls show Obama’s approval rating
rising. In political terms — the only terms that matter to him — his foreign
policy has been a success.”
Sowell goes on to give a history lesson on Neville
Chamberlain’s handling of a treaty made with NAZI Germany in an
attempt to stave off war. At no time did
it appear that Chamberlain intended to set Great Britain up for the nasty
ramifications of such poor judgment; but at the same time his actions did
“throw a small country to the Nazi wolves in order to get a worthless agreement
with Hitler”.
On the other hand, as Sowell points out, Obama’s worthless
treaty giving Iran the
ability to expand its nuclear program may well be throwing Israel to the
wolves “for the sake of another worthless agreement”.
“If anyone examines the hard, cold
facts about the Obama administration’s actions and inactions in the Middle East
from the beginning, it is far more difficult to reconcile those actions and
inactions with a belief that Obama was trying to stop Iran from getting nuclear
weapons than it is to reconcile those facts with his trying to stop Israel from
stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons.”
If you consider the folks Obama has for
his inner circle then his intentions become more troubling.
His senior advisor, Valerie Jarrett, has ties
to the Muslim Brotherhood and openly stated she looks forward to using
America’s
ignorance and tolerance of all religions via the First Amendment to further advance
Islam into our society in order to bring about an eventual Transformation to Islam here.
Obama has been steadily weakening our military while at the
same time placing ‘questionable’ individuals who happen to be Muslim, not only
Muslim... but individuals who have ties to radical jihadist groups in key positions of government.
“In 2002 Mohamed Elibiary founded
the Freedom and Justice Foundation in Plano,
Texas. Freedom and Justice is the
political party of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. He was appointed a member of
the Homeland Security advisory council which meant Elibiary had access to
security documents. In October of 2011, it was reported he took sensitive
reports from the Texas Department of Public Safety.”
I almost wish I wasn’t aware of the loose ends, the shady
deals, the outright lies and deception Obama and his administration have
foisted off on the public, all the while claiming to be working for a better America. It would seem the America Obama wants our
constitutional republic Transformed into is under the flag of Islam.
America's economic recovery... It’s all for show and major media outlets refuse to report
the truth, instead they prefer building up Obama’s image as America’s first and greatest Black
president.
I haven’t brought up job reports, unemployment or the
disturbing fact that 63 million potential members of the workforce don’t have a
job, some of them having quit looking long ago so they aren’t considered
unemployed. How’s that for another of
Obama’s Potemkin Villages?
This article has been cross posted to The Moral Liberal, a publication whose banner reads, “Defending The
Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & The American Constitution”.
1 comment:
The origins of the word Potemkin is a classic video titlef, Battleship Potemkin.
Post a Comment