I saw this
poster on Facebook and had to respond.
How do you gently explain to one of your ‘friends’ that by supporting
the progressive agenda to remove military style weapons from private ownership
and use, that such a ban does absolutely nothing to protect honest citizens,
and in fact puts them at even greater risk?
To start
with, the term Assault Rifle was a creation, a scary and frightening name made
up to sway the public's opinion in order to push through legislation which
would eventually remove any military style weapon from the private sector. The
left continues to push their anti-2nd Amendment agenda at every opportunity as
they rely on knee jerk public reaction after any violent incident. In the Orlando attack the media
reported that the weapon used was an AR-15 Assault Rifle when in fact it was
not. Facts are not a strong suit for reporting any more when it comes to
pushing an agenda.
All that said, do you really believe that criminals (to include corrupt government officials), mass murderers, psychotic drugged out nutcases or radical Islamic terrorists are going to abandon the use of any weapon regardless of it having been banned?
All that said, do you really believe that criminals (to include corrupt government officials), mass murderers, psychotic drugged out nutcases or radical Islamic terrorists are going to abandon the use of any weapon regardless of it having been banned?
So what you
are demanding is that law abiding citizens give up their right to defend
themselves from criminals (to include corrupt government officials), mass
murderers, psychotic drugged out nutcases or radical Islamic terrorists.
The 2nd Amendment was included as part of the Bill of Rights to protect individuals from that day when their government became so corrupt as to turn on its citizens. We are getting ever closer to that day and you are joining in with that corrupt government's recognition that an armed citizenry is much more difficult to enslave. History has shown that a disarmed citizenry is far too easy to control.
The 2nd Amendment was included as part of the Bill of Rights to protect individuals from that day when their government became so corrupt as to turn on its citizens. We are getting ever closer to that day and you are joining in with that corrupt government's recognition that an armed citizenry is much more difficult to enslave. History has shown that a disarmed citizenry is far too easy to control.
“That the said Constitution shall
never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the
press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United
states who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms...” -- Samuel Adams, in “Phila. Independent
Gazetteer”, August 20, 1789
I'll leave it
at that and hope you come to realize the importance of individuals having
access and ownership of advanced weaponry, even to match the standard issue
weaponry being used by the military.
No comments:
Post a Comment