The way ideas are presented often predetermines the intended response. Each word chosen, presumably with a modest amount of thought, each word lends itself to an understanding based on a presumption that both the speaker and the listener share the interpretation of words based on common experiences and customs.
(Image of Water Well courtesy of Adobe)
This past
week I read an editorial originally published by the New York Times, “Are We
Losing Our Democracy?”. The brief screed
included twelve bullet points, each of which began with the term, “An
authoritarian…”
1)
An authoritarian stifles dissent and speech
2)
An authoritarian persecutes political opponents
3)
An authoritarian bypasses the legislature
4)
An authoritarian uses the military for domestic control
5)
An authoritarian defies the courts
6)
An authoritarian declares national emergencies on false pretenses
7)
An authoritarian vilifies marginalized groups
8
) An authoritarian controls information in the news media
9)
An authoritarian tries to take over universities
11)
An authoritarian creates a cult of personality
11)
An authoritarian uses power for personal profit
12)
An authoritarian manipulates the law to stay in power
Readers
would assume the article was aimed at the current administration, specifically President
Donald Trump, why else would such an editorial be published at this time, why
not when Obama was President, or Biden? If
the editorial wasn’t biased, then why use the term authoritarian?
Couldn’t
it be expressed that Donald Trump has, by virtue of having been elected
President under the rules and laws of our Constitutional Republic, wouldn’t it
have been accurate to state the as President Donald Trump has the Authority to
carry out the duties associated with that office, those duties which are
defined and verified by the highest court in the land?
But if you
wanted to poison the well water, paint those duties as Authoritarian, something
other than Authorized by law, then instead of accepting the lawful duties of
President, cast doubt on each action exactly as the New York Times editorial
did.
Taking to
task radical District Judges who don’t agree with the President’s actions,
judges who have usurped powers far beyond their legal scope, presenting this
before the Supreme Court isn’t, “An authoritarian defies the courts”, rather the
President is working within the constraints of our Constitutional Republican
form of government in order to validate his lawful actions.
You could
take each of the twelve bullet points expressed in the New York Times editorial
and ask the same question. Is the word Authoritarian
used properly or is this a whiney spoiled child’s expression that he or she
didn’t get the result he or she wanted.
It’s much easier to blame that worthless no good Orange haired guy than
to admit that he actually has the Authority to carry out the lawful agenda he
was voted into office to do.
Then there’s
the title offered by the New York Times, “Are We Losing Our Democracy?”. In the first place, the United States of
America isn’t a democracy, it’s a Constitutional Republic.
From The
Daily Signal:
“We have
all heard the common talking point from the left that conservatives
are destroying democracy. The response to this claim is the same time and time
again: “We’re not a democracy; we’re a constitutional republic!” This leads us
to ask an important question: Are there any differences between the two, and if
so, why do they matter?”
The article by The Daily Signal
went on to quote from Hamilton, Jefferson and Adams; each having expressed
warnings associated with governments based on democracy. My favorite was, “Democracy
is like two wolves and a lamb voting on what to eat for lunch, but a republic
is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.”
“Thomas Jefferson is our second
Founder to see profound issues with democracy. Jefferson said, “The republican is the only form
of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of
mankind.”
Jefferson recognized the secret war
that occurs under a democracy, a war for power and control. The secret war is
fought in many political systems. There is a reason Plato said, “Dictatorship
naturally arises out of democracy.”
As a matter of interest, it is
commonly taught and accepted by scholarly individual that here in America we have a Democratic Republican form of government. Rather than argue the finer points which
serve no purpose, it’s much easier to simply say, “You’re right” and let them
feel better about having won their point.

No comments:
Post a Comment