Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Private Property in Socialist America

If Rip Van Winkle woke up in America today he’d wonder what happened to private property rights.  Imagine finding out other folks can dictate what you can use your property for; this must be some kind of bad dream, go back to sleep and maybe the next time you open your eyes things will return to how it should be.

Take for example the Pebble Partnership which invested over “107 million monitoring the soil, water and air in order to assure the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) it can mine without causing ecological damage” prior to mining precious metals.  They can’t turn a shovel without getting permission from every environmental whack job in the State of Alaska because it might change the way things have looked since before time was measured.

According to an article by Joshua Rhett Miller on the Fox News website environmental groups along with the EPA have halted the development of the Pebble Mine, perhaps indefinitely because there might be damage done to the fishing industry if anything goes wrong.

“If you read the watershed assessment, the conclusion that the EPA came to is that even without a catastrophic dam failure, there would be cumulative effects over time that would have an adverse effect on fish and other animals in the region,” said Lindsey Bloom, an organizer with Trout Unlimited and operator of a commercial fishing boat. “For us, if you look at the Exxon Valdez oil spill or the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf, consumers just balk at the idea of potential pollution in their seafood.”

Pebble Partnership bought the land, not Lindsey Bloom, not Trout Unlimited and certainly not the EPA who supposedly represent the interests of the American people.   They’ve invested considerable money towards developing a profitable venture to extract what could potentially come to billions of dollars in gold, copper and other valuable metals; why should they consider the demands of anyone not invested in that particular private property?  

“Just as man can’t exist without his body, so no rights can exist without the right to translate one’s rights into reality, to think, to work and keep the results, which means: the right of property.”  Ayn Rand

The argument proposed by Trout Unlimited isn’t much different than saying it’s too dangerous to fly because airplanes fall out of the sky every now and then.  We can’t have any new dams because now and again they break; property and lives are lost.  We might get hit with a huge honking meteor and entire species of animals are gone in a flash.  It’s too dangerous to let anyone mine in Alaska or coal in Tennessee and you can forget about drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico; go back to bed.

“The mine has backing from some state officials. In June, state Attorney General Michael Geraghty wrote the EPA to complain of what he called an “unnecessary rush to judgment.” He sought to have the deadline for public comment extended to Nov. 20. Geraghty believes that if the EPA invokes the federal Clean Water Act in addressing the mining proposal, it could potentially “extinguish” the state’s mineral rights.”

The EPA has become so powerful it works outside constraints placed on government by our constitutional framework and has for quite some time.  Our nation has progressively moved towards socialism, ignoring property rights of individuals and corporations with impunity.  The courts have been used by self appointed social watchdog groups to impede lawful rights of property owners to such an extent that many corporations have abandoned the United States in favor of doing business in other countries where they are welcomed with open arms.

“So great moreover is the regard of the law for private property, that it will not authorize the least violation of it; no, not even for the general good of the whole community.”  William Blackstone

Property rights in America are evaporating like distilled dew which for a moment rests upon the morning grass and is gone.  Individuals and corporations no longer determine the use of their own property without first having to please everyone around them.  I’m afraid it old Rip Van Winkle were to fall asleep again, as many in America have failed in protecting their rights, there won’t be anything left to recognize; much as Washington Irving’s children’s story ended. 

Then, worn and weary, at last laid down,
For his locks were white and his limbs were sore--
And RIP VAN WINKLE will wake no more.

This article has been cross posted to The Moral Liberal, a publication whose banner reads, “Defending The Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & The American Constitution”.


Anonymous said...

That land is not owned by the mining companies. It is owned by the State of Alaska.

T. F. Stern said...

Carol; The company paid for the land for the express reason to develop it for mining. The state took their money knowing it was their intention to dig a mine and by not permitting the mine to proceed is the same as a breech of contract. The State of Alaska should have to give the company a fair return on the $107 million plus interest for wasting the company's time and investment or let them proceed with the mining venture.

The same thing has been happening with oil leases; companies fork over huge amounts of money for the opportunity to drill for oil with no guarantee they will find oil; but then, after paying for the oil lease these same companies are denied permission to drill. That is also fraud. The environmental movement has made liars and thieves of government, and in so doing made all of us liars and thieves since government is a representation of We The People. We are stealing from those who enter into contracts with us, we are defrauding these companies by denying them use of their leases.

tisanjosh said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.