Our nation was founded on sound principles; life, liberty
and the pursuit of happiness. The
pursuit of happiness was a flowery alternative for property, or so it was at
one time. Today it might mean something else since life and liberty no longer
mean much either.
There’s a fairly important property case taking shape which
many would just as soon go away. It
involves the government’s “taking” of raisins of all things; that’s right,
shriveled up grapes are at the center of a major court battle.
An article by Jonathan Stempel quickly pointed out that “Farmers object
to setting aside crops without payment”; imagine that, objecting to the
government confiscating your crops and not getting paid. These folks must think we live in America.
Lower court rulings, to include
the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have all ruled against
the plaintiffs citing a Depression Era ruling which “requires raisin
“handlers”, who include farmers and packers, to set aside part of their crops,
in an effort to prevent supply gluts and price volatility”.
There was a line in Stempel’s
article which jumped off the page and struck me on the cheek.
“The U.S. government had urged the Supreme Court not to accept the appeal.”
The translation of that line, “If the Supreme Court hears
this case it will open a whole can of worms and expose most legislation and government
regulations regarding property rights as pertain to individuals as being
unconstitutional”. Any arguments which
come before the court will challenge the validity of government’s interference
in the free market system. That having
been said, wouldn’t We The People want to have a clearly defined court ruling
on property rights; We The People being the government? (Silly me, I forgot what year this was)
Sounds like sour grapes to me.
Some of you may remember the free market system which, over
these many years has been corrupted and dismantled “one brick at a time”; to
the point where it is nearly gone. That
system regarded private property as the basis for a civilized society.
If you look at the formative thoughts upon which American
“doctrine” was founded, a variety of concepts were borrowed and then polished.
“Every man has a property in his
own person. This nobody has a right to, but himself.” ~John Locke
Followed closely by:
“Life, liberty, and property do not
exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that
life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in
the first place.” ~Frederic Bastiat
…and in our own day:
“Just as man can’t exist without
his body, so no rights can exist without the right to translate one’s rights
into reality, to think, to work and keep the results, which means: the right of
property.” ~Ayn Rand
So where does anyone in our government get away with
appropriating the goods or services of an individual or group of individuals
without just compensation? This doesn’t even
include the idea that an individual must first agree to relinquish his/her
property to begin with. The Kelo decision
marked a turn toward the dark side if ever there was one.
I’ll throw in one more property rights quote; but this from
an avid socialist:
“Property is organized robbery.”
~George Bernard Shaw
The rate of speed with which America is being transformed
from a free market system into a third world socialist backwater system has
escalated incredibly over my life time; yet nothing compares with the Obama
administration’s agenda. Some of you
might recall Robert McChesney, good buddy to Van Jones the ousted communist
Green Jobs Czar under Obama. McChesney
declared that capitalism has to be dismantled “brick by brick”.
Well at least McChesney was honest about his feelings and
purpose. He expressed what many
progressives want; not exactly an American concept; but what would you expect
when we have a Marxist Communist living in the White House?
This article has been cross posted to
The Moral Liberal, a publication whose banner reads, “Defending The
Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & The American Constitution”.
No comments:
Post a Comment