The question bears asking, can the media or scientists be
trusted to report on God? There’s been a
scientific breakthrough story dancing on the front page, Yahoo had a teaser to
get viewers interested, “‘God particle’ is a go”, followed by, “Scientists chasing the elusive ‘God particle’ announce
a “magnificent” breakthrough”.
If you follow the story it goes on to explain how scientists
attempting to unlock the mysteries of the universe by understanding the
smallest particles which make up our universe have found what they call boson
particles. Apparently there is a super
boson particle (my own summary) which they are calling the Higgs boson,
theorized as being the answer to how the Big Bang was set in motion, the
missing link to creation itself.
“The Higgs is sometimes referred to as the "God particle," to the chagrin
of many scientists, who prefer its official name.”
It stands to reason if scientists can explain ‘everything’
then there would be no need for the ‘hocus pocus’ involved with religion, faith
and clearly no need for God. The perfect
set up for a statist world, wouldn’t you say?
“From what is known about the
particle now, physicists have said the Higgs
boson may spell the universe's doom in the very far future. That's because
the mass of the Higgs boson is a critical part of a calculation that portends
the future
of space and time. Its mass of 126 times the mass of the proton is just
about what would be needed to create a fundamentally unstable universe that
would lead to a cataclysm billions of years from now.”
Some scientists have devoted a lifetime attempting to prove
that everything simply ‘happened’ rather than leaning on a crutch, as do the
simple minded, that a super being ‘created’ everything out of ‘nothing’. Have I overstated the division in thought
processes?
Think of the ramifications in the political arena, more
particularly how such a scientific discovery would play into the hands of
progressives intent on ‘transforming America’. Is it any wonder the media outlets are having
a field day with this story since a goodly percentage of the media leans far to
the left?
It follows that governments can overturn rights as easily as
they hand them out; God being a figment of mass imagination. The Declaration of Independence, Constitution
and Bill of Rights could be discounted and in a heartbeat change the course of
history.
Look at it from a progressive’s point of view. The entire premise of God given inalienable
rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness stems from…forgive my use
of words here, stems from mankind’s inherent weakness and belief that we must
have been created by a supreme being, God.
Our right to free speech, to own and bear arms or rights to
do anything all hinge on and are recorded in such a way as to affirm the
concept of a Creator. Things that were
accepted as common knowledge now are finding their way into the courts as part
of protest movement items; ‘In God We Trust’ and Ten Commandment are fixed to
and dependent on Judeo-Christian foundations as found in the Scriptures.
Upon reading the story about the so called ‘God particle’ my
mind recalled a passage of scripture, one which falls into a category I call
‘Gospel in a Nutshell’. This is an
admonition from a father to his sons regarding how things ‘are’; found in the
Book of Mormon, 2 Nep 2:13. The entire chapter is a gem worth going over;
but this one paragraph stands out as it relates to the topic of a Creator.
“And if ye shall say there is no
law, ye shall also say there is no sin. If ye shall say there is no sin, ye
shall also say there is no righteousness. And if there be no righteousness
there be no happiness. And if there be no righteousness nor happiness there be
no punishment nor misery. And if these things are not there is no God. And if
there is no God we are not, neither the earth; for there could have been no
creation of things, neither to act nor to be acted upon; wherefore, all things
must have vanished away.”
Some folks will say there is no God and consider themselves
intellectually superior to anyone who suggests otherwise.
There’s an interesting exchange between Ammon, a servant of
the Lord, and a fellow named Korihor as found in the Book of Mormon, Alma 30.
Korihor was a sharp witted antagonist who defiantly stood before the
people telling them that religious faith was a waste of time put in place to
keep them in bondage so priests could hold sway over them. Ammon took exception to Korihor’s challenges
and turned the tables on him.
“…Thou hast had signs enough; will
ye tempt your God? Will ye say, Show unto me a sign, when ye have the testimony
of all these thy brethren, and also all the holy prophets? The scriptures are
laid before thee, yea, and all things denote there is a God; yea, even the
earth, and all things that are upon the face of it, yea, and its motion, yea,
and also all the planets which move in their regular form do witness that there
is a Supreme Creator.”
Unfortunately for Korihor his acknowledgement of eternal
truths came too late as he was struck dumb for his rebellion to God; but
because the exchange was recorded for us in our day, his example serves as a
warning to have a little more respect for our Creator and Savior.
I read an article several years ago, Did God Write the Laws of Physics,
by John Pratt, a noted scientist who shares similar religious beliefs to those
I hold sacred. He wrote:
“Did God write the laws of physics or are they self-existent and God
just follows them perfectly? The scripture I am thinking of to answer this
question does not explicitly include all physical law, but it does refer to
some of the most fundamental laws of physics. The Lord has stated:
“God . . . hath given a law unto
all things, by which they move in their times and their seasons; And their
courses are fixed, even the courses of the heavens and the earth, which
comprehend the earth and all the planets." (D&C 88:41-43)
Thus, we are explicitly told that
God gave the law to the planets that controls their orbital motions. In modern
astronomy, those laws include Kepler's Laws, which can be derived from Newton's laws of motion
and his law of gravity. So I take that scripture to mean, “Yes, God wrote the
laws of physics.” The Lord also explains how the law is executed:
And the light which shineth, which
giveth you light, is through him who enlighteneth your eyes, which is the same
light that quickeneth your understandings; Which light proceedeth forth from
the presence of God to fill the immensity of space--
The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things. (D&C 88:11-13, emphasis added)”
The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things. (D&C 88:11-13, emphasis added)”
Will scientists looking for the elusive Higgs boson particle
prove their theories regarding the Big Bang and all of Creation? I seriously doubt it; but what is more
curious, will these same scientists acknowledge God’s hand in their very
existence, the ability to take in the breath of air which sustains them from
day to day?
It boils down to the age old question, do you believe in God
or not? Can science and religion work
hand in hand to discover eternal truths or are they at odds working along
different tangents that can never be reconciled. My guess, my belief, call it what you wish;
scientists will only find truths which were intended to be found in the eternal
plan designed and put into play by God.
This article has been cross posted to
The Moral Liberal, a publication whose banner reads, “Defending The
Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & The American Constitution”.
1 comment:
"Can the Media or Scientists be trusted to report on God?"
Purely a rhetorical device, right? The question answers itself.
Another tack would be the statement my old chemistry prof (and he was--back from "Emeritus" status at the time he was my prof) made as to science/religion (paraphrased here):
Science is suited to asking and attempting to answer "What-How-When" questions. Theology is suited to asking and attempting to answer "Why" questions. Rarely do the two have ground in common on any substantive matter.
I've found that to be the case in general. What-How-When answers may bolster or call into question particular statements of what-how-when in a particular religious narrative, but those what-how-when answers have no real impact on the Why questions addressed in the narrative.
Post a Comment